What this guide covers

Carriers reviewing the enforcement location and objections for unpaid international road freight.

A short questionnaire explains which records may matter and produces a document checklist. It does not assess eligibility or predict a case outcome.

Documents discussed in this guide
  • Complete carriage agreement, order and acceptance correspondence
  • CMR note, route and delivery records
  • Payment-place, maturity, address and amendment records
  • Jurisdiction or arbitration clause, annexes and acceptance records
  • Enforcement request, payment order, full objection and all service records
  • Mediation records and any complete decision/finality records

Full topic-specific Information Guide ↓

A carrier that has completed international road carriage may wish to pursue unpaid freight through the enforcement office at its own principal place of business. The debtor may respond that CMR applies and enforcement is possible only where the debtor is based. Neither statement supplies a definitive answer without the file. First identify whether the claim concerns carriage charges or cargo damage, the contracting parties, payment location and any jurisdiction clause. A CMR consignment note does not by itself resolve every court and enforcement question.

1. Distinguish freight charges from cargo compensation

CMR Article 1 defines the international carriage of goods by road for reward within its scope. Article 31 addresses proceedings arising from such carriage through connections with the country of the defendant’s ordinary residence or principal business, the branch or agency through which the contract was made, and the places of taking over and designated delivery. The claimant’s own business location is not listed as an independent connection merely because it is the claimant’s location. The provision also includes courts of contracting countries designated by agreement.

However, the jurisdictional approach to a carrier’s freight claim against its contractual payment debtor requires separate assessment. Sender, consignee, transport organiser and subcontracting carrier are not interchangeable. A counterclaim alleging cargo damage is also distinct from the freight charge itself. Choosing an enforcement location simply because the case involves international carriage, without separating contracts and claim items, can waste time and costs before the merits are reached.

2. Which records establish general jurisdiction and payment location?

Where domestic jurisdiction rules apply, Article 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure addresses the defendant’s domicile when proceedings commence, and Article 10 the contractual place of performance. Article 50 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law applies procedural jurisdiction rules by analogy to money or security enforcement and additionally recognises the enforcement office where the underlying contract was made. These provisions do not make every location from which an electronic message was sent the contract’s place of conclusion. Establish how the agreement arose and which obligation is to be performed.

Article 89 of the Turkish Code of Obligations first looks to the parties’ express or implied intention. Absent an agreement to the contrary, money is payable at the creditor’s domicile when payment falls due. It is therefore unsafe to infer jurisdiction solely from where an invoice was issued without reviewing the agreed payment place, maturity and amendments. Bank-account details, invoice address and current business address may be different records. Match the contractual debtor and relevant location at payment time for each carriage.

3. Read the judgment against the precise claim

In its judgment of 18 January 2016, E.2015/15452, K.2016/369, the Court of Cassation’s 11th Civil Chamber examined an action to annul an objection to enforcement of freight charges arising from CMR carriage. It applied domestic jurisdiction rules and held that the facts allowed enforcement and litigation at the creditor’s business location through the place of payment and Article 10. Its reference to former Code of Obligations No. 818, Article 73, is historical; current analysis must separately consider Article 89 and the actual agreement.

The 2016 judgment cannot be expanded into a rule allowing every CMR receivable to be enforced at the creditor’s location. In the same Chamber’s freight judgment of 27 June 2012, E.2011/5757, K.2012/11159, an Article 31-based jurisdiction assessment was accepted. Research must therefore address the particular file and current case law; the existence of two judgments with differing reasoning is expressly acknowledged here. A disposition alone or a search snippet does not establish why jurisdiction was accepted.

4. Examine jurisdiction and arbitration clauses separately

Under Articles 17–18, party status, a written agreement, an identifiable legal relationship and the designated court matter. A city name printed unilaterally on an invoice is not the same as a mutually agreed jurisdiction clause. Where CMR Articles 31 and 41 apply, assess whether the contractual term indirectly derogates from the Convention. Without that assessment, one sentence in standard terms cannot safely be treated as excluding every other forum.

A foreign-court clause requires separate consideration of Articles 1(2), 40 and 47 of the Turkish private international law statute; arbitration requires its applicable regime, including CMR Article 33. Article 33 addresses a clause providing that the arbitral tribunal must apply CMR. Obtain the complete foreign-language clause, incorporated annexes and acceptance records. This guide determines neither foreign-court jurisdiction nor the validity of arbitration, and does not establish that a foreign judgment is directly enforceable in Türkiye.

5. Distinguish objections to the enforcement office and to the court

In ordinary non-judgment enforcement by general attachment, Article 62 gives the debtor a general seven-day objection period from service of the payment order. Article 50 addresses jurisdiction objections alongside substantive objections. Obtain the full objection and identify whether it challenges the debt, the enforcement office’s jurisdiction, or both. The defence-based regime in Article 19 for non-exclusive court jurisdiction concerns a different procedural step.

The 2016 judgment also states that where the debtor challenges the enforcement office’s jurisdiction, the court hearing annulment of the objection must first address whether valid enforcement exists. Acceptance of the jurisdiction objection raises the absence of duly commenced enforcement. Selecting a competent court does not itself cure the original enforcement defect. Steps and periods for transfer, fresh enforcement or another action require separate assessment against the decision type, finality and service records.

6. The one-year annulment period is not the receivable’s limitation period

Article 67 provides one year from service of the objection on the creditor for an action to annul it. This forfeiture period for the procedural route differs from substantive limitation of the freight receivable. Preservation of an ordinary action after that year does not mean substantive limitation has been suspended. Application of CMR Article 32, claim classification, the trigger and suspension or interruption require separate review; a jurisdiction dispute does not make waiting safe.

For a commercial money claim or annulment action, assess the commercial court and mandatory pre-action mediation under Commercial Code Articles 5 and 5/A. Commencing non-judgment enforcement differs from filing proceedings. Article 18/A(15) of Law No. 6325 regulates the effect on limitation and forfeiture periods from application to the mediation bureau until the final record. Do not treat it as an automatic extension for objecting to a payment order; assess the arbitration exception and actual procedural timetable separately.

7. Which file should support the jurisdiction review?

For each carriage, assemble the order and acceptance correspondence, complete agreement and annexes, CMR note and delivery record, price/maturity/payment-location records, parties’ addresses at the relevant times, and any jurisdiction or arbitration clause. Where enforcement has begun, include the enforcement request, payment order, complete objection, all service records and mediation documents. Instead of choosing the debtor or forum from an invoice alone, prepare a short table showing the evidence for each jurisdictional connection.

A single file may combine delivery in Türkiye, a payment debtor in another country and separate payment terms. First identify which company is pursued for which contractual obligation and through which procedure, then compare jurisdictional options. The aim is enforcement that can be supported by evidence if challenged, rather than automatically choosing the office closest to the creditor. The interactive guide organises that preparation; it declares no court conclusively competent and calculates no individual deadline.

Sources

General information; individual documents, facts and procedures need separate review.

All guides · Türkçe · Return to article

Jurisdiction objections to freight enforcement: contract and procedure preparation guide

Answer the topic-specific questions, select your records, then view your tailored preparation summary and office-branded PDF.