Does a contractor’s claim become conclusive if the invoice is not disputed within eight days?

Full topic-specific Information Guide ↓

When an employer does not respond to the contractor’s invoice, it may seem that the claim can no longer be disputed. Expiry of eight days may provide an important evidential advantage, but does not by itself conclusively establish the contract, performance of all work, delivery or continued non-payment. Recovery preparation should distinguish the relationship underlying the invoice from the particular facts disputed by the recipient. This article concerns the contractor’s claim file under a private-law contract for work.

What exactly does the eight-day rule govern?

Article 21(2) of the Turkish Commercial Code provides that a person receiving an invoice who does not object to its contents within eight days of receipt is deemed to have accepted those contents. The starting point is not simply the issue date printed on the invoice: receipt by the addressee must be established. The statutory eight days must not be restated as eight working days. Notification and calculation require the actual records.

Reading the rule as “silence conclusively establishes every debt” weakens the contractor’s preparation. First establish that the invoice belongs to an existing obligation. The effect of deemed acceptance of its contents is then assessed in the particular dispute. Adding a new item of work, unilateral penalty or payment date to an invoice does not invariably secure the other party’s agreement to it.

Establish the contract and scope separately from the invoice

Match the signed agreement and schedules, accepted quotation, order correspondence, instructions and previous payments to the same project. Authority of the person requesting work on site also matters. A site worker’s message does not invariably establish authority to order additional work for the company. The contractor should explain for whom and with whose approval the work was undertaken through a coherent documentary chain.

For additional work, separate the original scope from the further request and prepare quantities, unit prices, changes and approvals. An invoice stating only “construction work” does not identify the work and its authorisation. Absence of a written agreement does not invariably mean no contract exists, but the Code of Civil Procedure’s evidence rules apply separately according to the amount and available evidence.

How should receipt of the invoice be documented?

For a paper invoice, preserve delivery, postal or courier records; for an electronic invoice, preserve the original file and system transmission and status records together. Match recipient, invoice number, date and amount. Do not label an electronic status “received”, “accepted” or “undisputed” without examining its technical meaning. Preserve original electronic records and transaction history as well as screenshots.

Rejection in the electronic invoicing system, the substance of a commercial-law objection and an objection to an enforcement payment order are separate matters. No system response does not prove that no objection was sent by another route. Tax cancellation or reporting procedures are likewise distinct from the existence of a civil claim. Verify current technical channels separately rather than treating everything as one “eight-day portal period”.

Performance, delivery and the defence of payment

Match interim payment statements, measurement sheets, site reports, photographs and handover records to the invoice items. Performance and the payment becoming due are different questions. Article 479 of the Code of Obligations generally makes payment due on delivery of the work, or on delivery of each part where separate delivery and corresponding prices were agreed. Examine contractual payment arrangements and the actual character of delivery separately.

Different evidence is needed where the employer says “I never ordered this”, “the work is incomplete” or “I paid”. Compare bank transfers and allocation records with the particular invoice and payment statement. Failure to dispute an invoice in time does not make subsequent payment irrelevant. For interest, distinguish the debt becoming due from default; do not automatically claim interest from the invoice date without examining notice and fixed-date conditions under Article 117.

What does the judgment establish—and what does it not?

In its judgment of 12 July 2011, E.2011/8811, K.2011/9166, the Fourteenth Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation considered enforcement under an alleged contract for work where the employer denied the relationship. It stated that posting an invoice alone did not sufficiently establish that relationship, but reversed the dismissal because oath evidence had not been addressed under the former procedural code. It did not directly uphold the contractor’s claim.

Its practical relevance is the warning against substituting an invoice for proof of the underlying relationship. The former-code treatment of a reference to “all lawful evidence” must not be converted into a claim that the same wording is invariably sufficient under today’s procedural code. Pleaded evidence, documentary-proof requirements and available correspondence require separate assessment under current rules.

Which court or enforcement route may be used?

For a due monetary claim, ordinary enforcement without a judgment or a debt action may be considered according to the circumstances. An invoice is not itself a court judgment. Under Article 62 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law, the debtor generally has seven days from service to object to an ordinary payment order; that differs from the eight days concerning the invoice. The appropriate response to an objection depends on the documents available.

The one-year period for an action to annul an enforcement objection under Article 67 starts with service of the objection on the creditor. Pre-action mediation is required for a commercial monetary claim or objection-annulment action falling within Article 5/A of the Commercial Code. Merchant status, connection with both commercial enterprises, a consumer transaction or another special regime affect subject-matter jurisdiction. Not every construction invoice belongs automatically in a commercial court.

For territorial jurisdiction, separately check the defendant’s domicile and contractual place of performance, enforcement venue and any valid jurisdiction agreement. An address printed on the invoice does not make every chosen location competent. Public-procurement payment statements or special deduction and objection arrangements require separate examination beyond this general article.

Eight days, one year and limitation are different

For claims under a contract for work, account for the five-year limitation rule in Article 147(6) and its gross-fault exception; Article 149 generally starts limitation when the debt becomes due. Different interim payments may have different due dates. This differs from the eight-day evidential rule and the one-year objection-annulment period. Article 67 preserves an ordinary debt action after the one-year period expires, but substantive limitation must still be assessed.

For the contractor, a strong file goes beyond “there was no objection”: it connects the relationship, authorised order, performance, delivery, invoice receipt and outstanding balance. The full guide below organises those records without collecting personal information or producing recovery guarantees or individual deadline calculations. A definitive enforcement strategy requires the actual contract and service records.

Sources

General information; individual documents, facts and procedures need separate review.

Silence after an invoice: the contractor’s contract and recovery preparation guide

Answer the topic-specific questions, select your records, then view your tailored preparation summary and office-branded PDF.